
When I first arrived in Denmark, I was completely surrounded by a new environment that I was very unfamiliar in. For me, the first thing I thought about after entering a new place was how different Denmark was visually and spatially. Throughout the whole trip, I continued to observe that the vast majority of houses (excluding the Queen’s summer home) were not huge and excessive like many of the houses in the United States, nor were they too small and uncomfortable to live in. There were no harsh divisions in wealth reflected through the residences in Denmark that I was so used to seeing. The use of space in Danish society reflects the egalitarian nature of Danish culture. For the most part, there were no major displays of wealth or success through the homes people lived in. This shows how space is being socially constructed. Space in this case is being shaped by cultural ideals that Danish society upholds.
The layout of the towns was also significant. In the neighborhood I stayed in, all of the homes were about the same size and were fairly close together, even though there were fields and other open space surrounding the neighborhood that the houses could have been put on. The neighborhoods appeared to be very homogenous-looking. The layout of the neighborhood and most of the neighborhoods in Denmark creates a very orderly environment where suburban living spaces share the same space as rural areas and farms. There were no distinct separations between the rural and the suburban. In hte center of many of the neighborhoods were playgrounds that could be used by neighborhood children. These two aspects reflect the value that Danish culture puts on a fair, level society.